Roman wrote:What? Another new wheeler?
Good, bad, or otherwise the answer to this is yes...
You and I have been friends long enough to appreciate that my vehicular ADD is clearly established and something like this should not come as a surprise. However, the reasoning behind this jump wasn't as simple as another case of just wanting something different. While I truly, and I do mean
truly, enjoyed the 6G platform for everything it offers that a comparable Jeep doesn't, the flipside shortcomings were weighing heavily on me. For anyone that cares, or just needs something to read to fall asleep to, I'll explain...
The 6G was developed with a crystal clear objective, and that was to go head-to-head with the Jeep Wrangler. In my opinion and experience, FoMoCo did an admirable job in developing solutions that were superior on a number of fronts. In no particular order, these are things that I believe to be better done by FoMoCo than Fiat:
* Overall ride / drive (we'll come back to this...)
* Infotainment
* Seats
* Driver / passenger storage for wallets, phones, ham sammiches, etc.
* Engine / transmission
* Switch locations for windows / mirrors and locking differentials / sway bar
* Cargo access with an OEM soft top
* Cameras
* Exterior lighting
Looking at this list, it seems to pretty much encompass everything a vehicle is supposed to do... So what's the Jeep Wrangler platform got that the 6G doesn't? Well folks, it boils down to a very simple aspect of that first bullet point about ride / drive, and I can sum it up in one single word:
articulation. Say it with me: arr-tik-yew-lay-shun. There is no refuting the fact that the 6G has a stunningly functional independent front suspension setup paired with an equally effective rear 5-link setup, and that combination of parts returns probably the best out-of-the-box ride quality of any wheeler out there. Add some larger squishy tires and that ride only improves when the going gets rougher, especially as you push the envelope in terms of speed. However, after 2-years of wheeling this platform in every environment imaginable from our local trails here in the PNW to the Rubicon and most recently Moab, the bottom line is that suspension technology cannot fully overcome physics. Gravity always,
always, wins.
To get very specific about my rant here, the lack of front-end articulation combined with the lower mass associated with the IFS combine to make, in my experience, a very unstable chassis when extreme articulation, off-camber, or steep climbs are encountered. Now don't get me wrong, we aren't talking about issues when running the trails in Naches, any BDR trail, anything you might find in South-Western Colorado or even a decent smattering of the trails around Moab. What we are talking about here is the "real" wheeling in the places I mentioned like the Rubicon, Fordyce, Dusy-Ershim, or Moab. Yes there are people, myself included, that have taken their 6G through these gauntlets and survived just fine. But... we've all also used a screwdriver as a hammer

Plain and simple, it's the wrong tool for the job.
The
logical argument and point for discussion here would come down to one's specific use case, and a simple breakdown of how often one is using it in this manner versus "normal" use. For me, like most, the "real" wheeling is comparatively minimal, and to be blunt that is why the 6G platform lasted for 2-years in the stable. It works so much better everywhere else it's almost obscene. But... But, in those instances where articulation and overall stability are necessary, it's difficult to describe just how badly you might miss it when it's not there. Trust me, I've been there done that and got the t-shirt

So... all of that is basically to say yes, we are taking a step backwards in time and technology and have picked up yet another white Jeep Wrangler

- IMG_1983.JPG (1.42 MiB) Viewed 289 times
