TCH Letter: Agencies have too much power over public lands

Land issues, laws, restrictions, etc...

Moderator: Grumpy

User avatar
Grumpy
Peak Putters' Land-Use Coordinator
Peak Putters' Land-Use Coordinator
Posts: 6049
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:38 am
Location: Kennewick, WA

TCH Letter: Agencies have too much power over public lands

Postby Grumpy » Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:41 am

In his book, Public Lands -- Public Debates, Char Miller points to a November 2006 memorandum of understanding that the Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service signed in partnership with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Parks Service. This pact committed the four agencies "to carry out shared joint management activities to achieve mutually beneficial resource management goals."

This is all playing out and unfolding as the federal land management agencies promote the implementation of their Travel Management Plans (Forest Service), Resource Management Plans (BLM), and the Endangered Species Act (Fish and Wildlife) which are being proposed to guide and govern our public lands over the next 15-20 years throughout the country.

These agencies have lost their capacity to listen to the American people and address their varied concerns regarding the nature of public lands management.

With a Congress that is stagnated and fiscally corrupted, one can only hope that common sense, honesty, integrity and accountability will some day return to the American scene. However, until that happens, which is unlikely, both consumptive and non-consumptive outdoor recreationalists and the public in general will continue to get the short end of the stick.

ANDY JOHNSON, Pasco
Dave
Have Scout, will wheel...Someday...Maybe


Quote:
Originally Posted by Oregon80
-By driving a Scout, you my friend have recycled, which is more than those pansy Prius owners can say.
-I love driving a piece of history that was nearly lost.

User avatar
Grumpy
Peak Putters' Land-Use Coordinator
Peak Putters' Land-Use Coordinator
Posts: 6049
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:38 am
Location: Kennewick, WA

Postby Grumpy » Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:43 am

Harold Wun · Top Commenter · Richland, Washington
What, exactly, are they doing you don't like? I have no idea from your letter, other than generic claims that amount to "I don't like what they are doing".
Dave

Have Scout, will wheel...Someday...Maybe





Quote:

Originally Posted by Oregon80

-By driving a Scout, you my friend have recycled, which is more than those pansy Prius owners can say.

-I love driving a piece of history that was nearly lost.

User avatar
Grumpy
Peak Putters' Land-Use Coordinator
Peak Putters' Land-Use Coordinator
Posts: 6049
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:38 am
Location: Kennewick, WA

Postby Grumpy » Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:43 am

Dave Walters · Works at The Arc of Tri-Cities
Wun, I suggest you do some research for yourself. The plans as being written now leave no room for traditional forest uses such as wood cutting, trail riding, four wheeling, and any number of activities. As you are on FB, go look at Forest Access for All, or my club page, Peak Putters of the Tri Cities. Then get a look at the Center for Biological Diversity, Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, or Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility. And while you have your computer working towards meltdown, look up the phrases "sue and settle" and "mega settlement". Those last are what's really driving a lot of this. Thes groups are so litigious they've made many in the federal agencies afraid to say or do anything for fear of lawsuits, so they take the path of least resistance and put up the closed sign.
Dave

Have Scout, will wheel...Someday...Maybe





Quote:

Originally Posted by Oregon80

-By driving a Scout, you my friend have recycled, which is more than those pansy Prius owners can say.

-I love driving a piece of history that was nearly lost.


Return to “Land Matters & Legislative Issues”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot and 67 guests