1st. or 2nd. Gen?

Post whatever here.

Moderator: TJDave

User avatar
GetZPayd
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 5:16 pm
Location: Kennewick

1st. or 2nd. Gen?

Postby GetZPayd » Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:12 pm

Ok heres the "plan"...Since my wifes Rubi is...well, my wifes, she informed me I would need to buy another rig to "trash". We are a family of 5 with our 12 y.o. son, a 7 y.o. daughter and mutt, so i was kicking around the idea of a 4Runner. As a newb wheeler Im unsure of the +/- of both 1st/2nd gen 4Runners, so Im looking for some direction... the "plan" is...
a Ford 347 stroker, C4/C6, 205/203 stacked, tons?/44?, on 42ish rubber..
The floor is now open for debate... :D

User avatar
Grumpy
Peak Putters' Land-Use Coordinator
Peak Putters' Land-Use Coordinator
Posts: 6049
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:38 am
Location: Kennewick, WA

Postby Grumpy » Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:19 pm

Get with Cim (toyman2). He's got a killer 1st gen...
Dave
Have Scout, will wheel...Someday...Maybe


Quote:
Originally Posted by Oregon80
-By driving a Scout, you my friend have recycled, which is more than those pansy Prius owners can say.
-I love driving a piece of history that was nearly lost.

User avatar
Lurch
Posts: 2365
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 7:10 am
Location: Pasco

Postby Lurch » Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:32 pm

The power train sounds good, but I would find a different rig to put it in. But I am kinda bias.

This would be a good start.

http://kpr.craigslist.org/cto/1712786138.html
You can follow me.... but it's gonna hurt ;)

User avatar
GetZPayd
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 5:16 pm
Location: Kennewick

Postby GetZPayd » Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:44 pm

Lurch, I love the EBs man, i was leaning toward the 4Runner cuz the prices are right, but man that one is resonable. Just a guess, 302, C4, NP203 and D44 and a 30 in rear? (axles are somewhat of a guess)...i do like it tho, can these be found at that price often? LOL on the bias part as im a Ford man aswell =)

User avatar
Lurch
Posts: 2365
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 7:10 am
Location: Pasco

Postby Lurch » Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:00 pm

Not sure how it's equiped but if I had to guess. Based on the year it's got a 302, 289, or inline 6. 3 speed manual trans, dana 20 t-case. Dana 30 front, 9" rear. Manua steering and manual drum brakes.
I would also bet by the carpet on the floor that there is gonna be some rust in the floors. I was half tempted to go take a look but I already have 3 of em :roll:
You can follow me.... but it's gonna hurt ;)

User avatar
Lud
Peak Putters Member
Peak Putters Member
Posts: 1046
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 2:50 pm
Location: Pasco, WA

Postby Lud » Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:07 pm

I figured you might be all over that one, Tim. I've seen one thats the same color fully restored just down the street from me.
2004 TJ Wrangler X (Rubiclone)
2.5" OME Lift, 1.25 in Body Lift, Flat Fender Flares
35x12.50x15 Maxxis Razor MTs
D30 ARB 4.56s Rear JKD44 w/ 8.8 disk brakes Ford 9" goodies, 4.56 and ARB.

User avatar
GetZPayd
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 5:16 pm
Location: Kennewick

Postby GetZPayd » Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:24 pm

ah thats right, forgot about the 9", and from the looks of it a 3 speed, hows the d20? dont know much or heard much about them?

User avatar
Lurch
Posts: 2365
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 7:10 am
Location: Pasco

Postby Lurch » Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:30 pm

That's what I'm running in mine, I twin sticked it. They hold up pretty well for the most part. Mine is just now starting to make noise. I think it's just getting worn.
You can follow me.... but it's gonna hurt ;)

User avatar
Don
Posts: 816
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:40 pm
Location: Pasco, WA

Postby Don » Wed Apr 28, 2010 9:33 pm

Tim, do you have a 351w laying around there?

User avatar
Lurch
Posts: 2365
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 7:10 am
Location: Pasco

Postby Lurch » Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:40 am

Nope the last one I had went into the truck Chris sold to Dave. The engine in your boat go south?
You can follow me.... but it's gonna hurt ;)

User avatar
tobyw
Posts: 1971
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 10:00 am
Location: Under the hood...

Re: 1st. or 2nd. Gen?

Postby tobyw » Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:48 am

GetZPayd wrote:the "plan" is...
a Ford 347 stroker, C4/C6, 205/203 stacked, tons?/44?, on 42ish rubber..
The floor is now open for debate... :D


:shock: Where do you plan to wheel? For what it's worth, there is no place in this state, or any neighboring states for that matter, that require anything close to this level of equipment. Sure it's fun to have the biggest d!ck in the group when you're BSing around the campfire, but honestly, what's the point? I would find an XJ and build a $2500 wheeler that'll whip any trail around here, and spend the rest of your budget on that wife and kids you mentioned.

There is my contribution to the debate :twisted:
Yep, I've wheeled one of those, too...
Image

User avatar
GetZPayd
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 5:16 pm
Location: Kennewick

Postby GetZPayd » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:23 am

Too much Toby? I was just trying to put a gameplan together in my head so i had a direction when my junk starts breaking. The way i see it, basically, you build toyotas one of 2 ways, heavy or light. I had just opted for the heavy buil.d using mainly non-toyota parts. And belive me when i say, i am not in an "epeen contestant", just looking forward to the end of the build rather then the beginning i guess. Ok ok, so the 42's are too big, i would agree, but i dont think i would go any shorter then 37's. And like i said, im not sure how much is too much as im new to this, i know what others have said and just went with a ballpark, knowing the pieces all would work togther.

User avatar
Lurch
Posts: 2365
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 7:10 am
Location: Pasco

Postby Lurch » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:49 am

I currently run 37"s. I have run as big as 38s on my bronco but started with 36s. To be honest I liked the 36s best so I split the difference and went 37. Anything bigger then that and it starts getting expensive. I wouldn't mind having a set of 42s for snow though. But for normal trail use 37s are plenty big. Remember if you go to big you start getting top heavy and breaking more drive train parts. Not to mention it becomes a trailer queen. As far as engine size I have been tempted to build a stroker myself. I am kinda a hourse power junky though. Remember just cause you have a big v8 doesn't mean you have to drive it like you do.

Hey Toby what engine did your yj have in it?
You can follow me.... but it's gonna hurt ;)

User avatar
tobyw
Posts: 1971
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 10:00 am
Location: Under the hood...

Postby tobyw » Thu Apr 29, 2010 7:32 am

Started with a dead 4cyl, then I dropped in a 350SBC because it was the least expensive way to get back on the trails...

Getz - don't take it the wrong way, I'm certainly not against built (or overbuilt) rigs. I have run the gammut with my junk over the years. But if you just want something to cruise the trails around this area, be reliable and family friendly, I personally would crank your plans down a couple notches :lol:
Yep, I've wheeled one of those, too...

Image

User avatar
White trash
Posts: 1763
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:38 pm
Location: El Pasco

Postby White trash » Thu Apr 29, 2010 11:02 am

Build it big build it strong and you won't have to worry if your piece of crap toothpick axles will survive the trail or not. Nothing is more annoying than breakage so why have to worry if your junk is going to be strong enough or have to limit what you are doing in any way shape or form for fear of your junk failing?


Big tires absolutely do NOT make a rig top heavy unless the builder is attempting to make a monster truck or florida swamp rig. I'm proof of that, I have the largest tires, most ground clearance and my roof line is at or below all the tj's on 35's around here. Yup sure sounds terrible to me. :lol:

User avatar
GetZPayd
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 5:16 pm
Location: Kennewick

Postby GetZPayd » Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:42 pm

Toby, no offense taken, i knew where you were going with it, and you have a good point. I had already givin' in to the fact, that it more then likely, it would be a trailer queen. Maybe build something that is street legal, and for the longer trips just trailer it...wow, never thought of that..

Lurch, I hear ya on the bigger the rubber the money green it cost ya, but Im with Trashy on the as far as "building it like a monster truck" comment.
I dont want or need a a massive lift just for the tread size, sure its alot more work trimming, cutting, & moving stuff around to get those dogs on there, but the finished produce is worth it. Trashy...I like that way you think, build it big, and dont worry bout it!!

User avatar
iaccocca
Peak Putters Member
Peak Putters Member
Posts: 3718
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:38 am
Location: Kennewick, WA

Re: 1st. or 2nd. Gen?

Postby iaccocca » Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:46 pm

GetZPayd wrote:Ok heres the "plan"...Since my wifes Rubi is...well, my wifes, she informed me I would need to buy another rig to "trash". We are a family of 5 with our 12 y.o. son, a 7 y.o. daughter and mutt, so i was kicking around the idea of a 4Runner. As a newb wheeler Im unsure of the +/- of both 1st/2nd gen 4Runners, so Im looking for some direction... the "plan" is...
a Ford 347 stroker, C4/C6, 205/203 stacked, tons?/44?, on 42ish rubber..
The floor is now open for debate... :D


Just get your wife to wheel the Rubi and ride shotgun. :twisted:
Okay, we're a little crazy to have a Duramax for a daily driver. But if we go off our meds, we might wind up in a Prius.
If you want to hear God laugh, tell Him your plans.
N7EEL WROD249
8-) Image 8-)

User avatar
GetZPayd
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 5:16 pm
Location: Kennewick

Postby GetZPayd » Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:56 pm

Actually Lee...(it is Lee right?) our Rubi, is just like your...and i think our daughter went to school together at St. Joes...ring a bell?

User avatar
White trash
Posts: 1763
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:38 pm
Location: El Pasco

Postby White trash » Thu Apr 29, 2010 4:00 pm

What tires and lift you run depends solely on your attitude towards cutting and welding. I'm shooting for a full bodied rig with most of the capabilities of a buggy but street legalish enough to drive to the closer runs. I can probably give you some ideas on at least what not to do to this point. :lol:

User avatar
SPR
Peak Putters Member
Peak Putters Member
Posts: 2369
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 6:31 am
Location: Tri-Cities

Postby SPR » Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:45 pm

As a newby wheeler... Sell the mall crawler rubicon and by a tj sport and some rubicon stickers. Take the left over money and by a GSA or forest service Cherokee. Then take the left over money and build the Cherokee to run 33" or 35" tires. Now, enjoy yourself with the money you save in car payments and insurance. :D

Around here, there is no sense in building a family rig that runs 42" tires because your family won't want to ride along with you in places that require 42" tires.

Sorry for being a bubble popper....

P.S. Buy a good winch and shovel before you buy big tires.
I don't Text (at least not very well), I eat Blackberrys, and I only Twitter after sex...

toyman2
Posts: 608
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:47 pm
Location: Walla Walla,WA

Postby toyman2 » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:15 pm

i have to agree and disagree with whitetrash.
his rig is the exception to most rules.

i have a 86 runner that is pretty built,i run 37s for normal driving,rocks,trail and anything but snow and dont ever have any problems now for snow i run 39s and dont have much problem except for limited up travel in the front.
i can run down the HWY at HWY speeds no problem and i dont have any problems with the cops bothering me.

id be happy to answer any questions if you have any.
i dont no the way you wheel so i cant say how to build your rig but its kinda over kill and you will need tons with a power plant like that

User avatar
GetZPayd
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 5:16 pm
Location: Kennewick

Postby GetZPayd » Thu Apr 29, 2010 7:11 pm

Toyman, I found your "spec" sheet and I am looking it over..issues? anything you would change?
Toylet...not a chance on selling it, it is a sick mall crawlers tho :D *Flexes on parking block at WalMart*
Also..would 37's be too much for this area? What about blue lake and naches areas?

toyman2
Posts: 608
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:47 pm
Location: Walla Walla,WA

Postby toyman2 » Thu Apr 29, 2010 7:45 pm

where is my spec sheet mabey i need to look at it and then i can change the things ive changed.
i really like my set up it seems to work pretty well.

not much id change,it would be nice on the hwy to go over a hill faster than i do but its not bad but i do get almost 20mpg.

the rear springs im not a huge fan of but they work pretty well.
i dont flex the most and im not the fasest but for a well rounded rig
it will go pretty much anywhere most any rig will except for a buggy
but i can run it on the road

User avatar
Don
Posts: 816
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:40 pm
Location: Pasco, WA

Postby Don » Thu Apr 29, 2010 11:17 pm

Lurch wrote:Nope the last one I had went into the truck Chris sold to Dave. The engine in your boat go south?


Nope, boat is great. Just looking for something to tinker on for other future plans. I'm pondering a 393/408 ...

User avatar
SPR
Peak Putters Member
Peak Putters Member
Posts: 2369
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 6:31 am
Location: Tri-Cities

Postby SPR » Fri Apr 30, 2010 5:31 am

Also..would 37's be too much for this area? What about blue lake and naches areas?


For the most part, trails in those areas can be ran easily enough with 33" tires and a rear locker. If those trails are really wet or snowy, it can be very tough travel regardless what size tires you're running. Regardless of what tire size you run, you want to be able to keep your center of gravity low, turn sharp, not get much wider than your rubicon, and not tax the crude out of your running gear.
I don't Text (at least not very well), I eat Blackberrys, and I only Twitter after sex...


Return to “General BS Area”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests